MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976535291 · doi:10.1086/501350

The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. VI. Isophotal Analysis and the Structure of Early‐Type Galaxies

2006· article· en· W1976535291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSurface brightnessVirgo ClusterAstronomyGalaxyElliptical galaxyBrightest cluster galaxyLuminosity functionAdvanced Camera for SurveysLuminosityExtrapolationStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a detailed analysis of the morphology, isophotal parameters and surface brightness profiles for 100 early-type members of the Virgo Cluster, from dwarfs (MB = −15.1 mag) to giants (MB = −21.8 mag). Each galaxy has been imaged in two filters, closely resembling the Sloan g and z passbands, using the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope. Dust and complex morphological structures are common. Dust is detected in as many as 18, preferentially bright, galaxies. The incidence rate in the 26 galaxies brighter than BT = 12.15 mag, which form a magnitude limited sample, is 42%. The amount and distribution of dust show no obvious correlations with galaxy morphology; dust features range from faint wisps and patches on tens of parsec scales, to regular, highly organized kpc-scale dust disks. Blue star clusters are interspersed within the larger, clumpier dust disks, while thin, dynamically cold stellar disks are seen in association with the smaller, uniform nuclear dust disks. Kiloparsec-scale stellar disks, bars, and nuclear stellar disks are seen in 60% of galaxies with intermediate luminosity (−20 . MB . −17). In at least one case (VCC 1938 = NGC 4638), the large-scale stellar disk has a sharp inner edge, possibly produced when disk instabilities led to the formation of a (now dissolved) bar. This process might indeed be seen unfolding in one galaxy, VCC 1537 (=NGC 4528). A spiral structure might be present in VCC 1199, an elliptical companion of M49. In dwarf galaxies, spiral structures are confirmed in VCC 856 and detected for the first time in VCC 1695. Surface brightness profiles, ellipticities, major axis position angles, and isophotal shapes are derived typically within 8 kpc from the center for the brightest galaxies, and 1.5 kpc for the faintest systems, with a resolution (FWHM) of 7 pc. For all but 10 of the galaxies, the surface brightness profiles are well described by a S´ersic model with index n which increases steadily from the fainter to the brightest galaxies. In agreement with previous claims, the inner profiles (typically within 100 pc of the center) of eight of the 10 brightest galaxies, to which we will refer as “core” galaxies, are lower than expected based on an extrapolation of the outer S´ersic model, and are better described by a single power-law function. Core galaxies are clearly distinct in having fainter central surface brightness, μ0, and shallower logarithmic slope of the inner surface brightness profile, γ, than expected based on the extrapolation of the trend followed by the rest of the sample, for which both μ0 and γ increase steadily with galaxy magnitude. Large-scale, global properties also set core galaxies apart: the effective radius in particular is found to be almost one order of magnitude larger than for only slightly less luminous non-core galaxies. Contrary to previous claims, we find no evidence in support of a strong bimodal behavior of the inner profile slope, γ; in particular the γ distribution for galaxies which do not show evidence of multiple morphological components (disks or bars) is unimodal across the entire magnitude range (a factor 460 in B−band luminosity) spanned by the ACSVCS galaxies. Although core galaxies have shallow inner profiles, the shallowest profiles (lowest γ values) are found in faint dwarf systems. The widely adopted separation of early-type galaxies between “core” and “power-law” types, which had originally been prompted by the claim of a clear bimodal distribution of γ values, is therefore untenable based on the present study. Once core galaxies are removed, dwarf and bright ellipticals display a continuum in their morphological parameters, contradicting some previous beliefs that the two belong to structurally distinct classes. However, dwarfs span a wider range in morphological characteristics than brighter systems: their surface brightness profiles vary from exponential to almost r1/4 laws, they comprise both nucleated and non-nucleated varieties, and several systems display evidence of disks, spiral structures and recent star formation. This is taken as evidence that dwarf galaxies, as currently classified, form a heterogeneous class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it