Selling Berlin: Imagebildung und Stadtmarketing von der preussischen Residenz bis zur Bundeshauptstadt
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This collection of essays on the history of Berlin's Stadtmarketing developed out of a 2005 interdisciplinary workshop organized by the editors to test whether the competitive drive to create marketable images for cities has deep historical roots or whether it is a recent response to globalization. The twenty-one authors included identify a long tradition of marketing Berlin, which consistently necessitated negotiation between competing and often acrimonious interests within the city. Anyone looking for reference to the economic side of the ‘sale’ will be disappointed. The editors are explicit in their intention to wrestle the theme of marketing away from the economic and business historians. Instead, the focus is on three categories of actors who have contributed to Berlin's image-making: first, officials, from Prussian kings to local politicians and occupying forces; second, citizen or corporate interests united with political authorities to present a positive image of the city; and third, the critical or oppositional voices who try to interject their own alternative visions (p. 15).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it