MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976912553 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2007.18.85

Structure theorems for linear and non-linear differential operators admitting invariant polynomial subspaces

2007· article· en· W1976912553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsLinear subspaceOperator theoryDifferential operatorInvariant (physics)PolynomialInvariant polynomialNonlinear systemLinear operatorsAlgebraic structureAlgebraic number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we derive structuretheorems which characterize the spaces of linear and non-lineardifferential operators that preserve finite dimensional subspacesgenerated by polynomials in one or several variables. By means ofthe useful concept of deficiency, we can write an explicit basis forthese spaces of differential operators. In the case of linearoperators, these results apply to the theory of quasi-exactsolvability in quantum mechanics, especially in the multivariatecase where the Lie algebraic approach is harder to apply. In thecase of non-linear operators, the structure theorems in this papercan be applied to the method of finding special solutions ofnon-linear evolution equations by nonlinear separation of variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it