MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977022394 · doi:10.1049/iet-map:20070125

Theory of self-adjoint <i>S</i> -parameter sensitivities for lossless non-homogenous transmission-line modelling problems

2008· article· en· W1977022394 on OpenAlexaff
Peter A. W. Basl, Mohamed H. Bakr, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lineLossless compressionSensitivity (control systems)Line (geometry)Applied mathematicsMathematicsTransmission (telecommunications)Port (circuit theory)Electric power transmissionMathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmElectronic engineeringGeometryEngineeringTelecommunicationsData compression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present, for the first time, a comprehensive theory for self-adjoint S-parameter sensitivities of non-homogenous transmission-line modelling problems. They show that wideband S-parameter sensitivities can be efficiently calculated without carrying out any adjoint simulations. The Np original simulations used to calculate the S-parameters of an Np-port electromagnetic structure supply the sensitivities as well. The authors also present their approach for two different types of nodes utilised in transmission-line modelling. The efficiency and accuracy of their algorithms are illustrated through a number of examples. Good match is obtained between their self-adjoint sensitivities and those calculated using finite differences at the response level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207