MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977443150 · doi:10.1002/rra.682

A review of hydroecological results of the Northern River Basins Study, Canada. Part 2. Peace–Athabasca Delta

2002· review· en· W1977443150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRiver Research and Applications · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsGenome Prairie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributarySnowmeltDeltaHydrology (agriculture)OverbankEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffDrainage basinFlooding (psychology)Riparian zoneSpring (device)HabitatSnowGeologyStructural basinGeographyEcologyGeomorphologyFluvial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Peace–Athabasca Delta (PAD) in northern Canada is one of the world's largest freshwater deltas. Concern developed over the ecological health of this system in the early 1970s following regulation of its main headwater tributary, the Peace River. Continued drying of the delta into the 1990s resulted in the initiation of two major science programs, the Northern River Basins Study and the Peace–Athabasca Delta Technical Studies. Recognizing the importance of water to restoring and maintaining biological productivity and diversity of the PAD, a series of studies was initiated to explain the reasons for the protracted drying and to design methods to restore flooding. These studies demonstrated that open‐water floods from the Peace River were unlikely to flood the ecologically sensitive perched basins within the PAD. Moreover they discovered that most large‐scale overbank flooding resulted from ice‐jams formed during spring break‐up. Increases in freeze‐up ice levels due to enhanced winter flows from the reservoir and a decrease in spring snowmelt runoff from downstream tributaries were suggested as being responsible for a decline in the frequency and severity of ice‐jam floods. Based on results from numerical modelling studies of ice‐jams, a flow augmentation strategy was designed to aid the formation of ice‐jams near the PAD. Results of a test trial based on this strategy are presented. An update is also provided about ecological studies conducted since the delta was recharged by floodwaters in 1996. Copyright © 2002 Environment Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it