MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977729057 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2014.2311496

Distributed Channel Selection for Interference Mitigation in Dynamic Environment: A Game-Theoretic Stochastic Learning Solution

2014· article· en· W1977729057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer sciencePotential gameChannel (broadcasting)RegretInterference (communication)Mathematical optimizationChannel allocation schemesSet (abstract data type)Distributed computingComputer networkMathematicsWirelessNash equilibriumTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the problem of distributed channel selection for interference mitigation in a canonical communication network. The channel is assumed time-varying, and the active user set is considered dynamically variable due to the specific service requirement. This problem is formulated as an exact potential game, and the optimality property of the solution to this problem is first analyzed. Then, we design a low-complexity fully distributed no-regret learning algorithm for channel adaptation in a dynamic environment, where each active player can independently and automatically update its action with no information exchange. The proposed algorithm is proven to converge to a set of correlated equilibria with a probability of 1. Finally, we conduct simulations to demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves near-optimal performance for interference mitigation in dynamic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it