Burstiness-Aware Resource Reservation for Server Consolidation in Computing Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In computing clouds, burstiness of a virtual machine (VM) workload widely exists in real applications, where spikes usually occur aperiodically with low frequency and short duration. This could be effectively handled through dynamically scaling up/down in a virtualization-based computing cloud; however, to minimize energy consumption, VMs are often highly consolidated with the minimum number of physical machines (PMs) used. In this case, to meet the dynamic runtime resource demands of VMs in a PM, some VMs have to be migrated to some other PMs, which may cause potential performance degradation. In this paper, we investigate the burstiness-aware server consolidation problem from the perspective of resource reservation, i.e., reserving a certain amount of extra resources on each PM to avoid live migrations, and propose a novel server consolidation algorithm, QUEUE. We first model the resource requirement pattern of each VM as a two-state Markov chain to capture burstiness, then we design a resource reservation strategy for each PM based on the stationary distribution of a Markov chain. Finally, we present QUEUE, a complete server consolidation algorithm with a reasonable time complexity. We also show how to cope with heterogenous spikes and provide remarks on several extensions. Simulation and testbed results show that, QUEUE improves the consolidation ratio by up to 45 percent with large spike size and around 30 percent with normal spike size compared with the strategy that provisions for peak workload, and achieves a better balance between performance and energy consumption in comparison with other commonly-used consolidation algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".