MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978360634 · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2012.2212774

Algorithms to Approximately Solve NP Hard Row-Sparse MMV Recovery Problem: Application to Compressive Color Imaging

2012· article· en· W1978360634 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed sensingAlgorithmNondeterministic algorithmSparse approximationConvex optimizationMathematical optimizationRegular polygonComputational complexity theoryComputer scienceOptimization problemRowMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the row-sparse multiple measurement vector (MMV) recovery problem. This requires solving a nondeterministic polynomial (NP) hard optimization. Instead of approximating the NP hard problem by its convex/nonconvex surrogates as is done in other studies, we propose techniques to directly solve the NP hard problem approximately with tractable algorithms. The algorithms derived in here yields better recovery rates than the state-of-the-art convex (spectral projected gradient) algorithm we compared against. We show that the compressive color image reconstruction can be formulated as an MMV recovery problem with sparse rows and therefore can be solved by our proposed method. The reconstructed images are more accurate (improvement about 2 dB in peak signal-to-noise ratio) than the previous technique compared against.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it