MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automatic Detection of Cylindrical Objects in Built Facilities

2014· article· en· W1978413157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHough transformPoint cloudLaptopLaser scanningComputer scienceFocus (optics)Parametric statisticsPipingComputer visionPoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringImage (mathematics)LaserMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional (3D) facility models are in increasing demand for design, maintenance, operations, and construction project management. For industrial and research facilities, a key focus is piping, which may comprise 50% of the value of the facility. In this paper, a practical and cost-effective approach based on the Hough transform and judicious use of domain constraints is presented to automatically find, recognize, and reconstruct 3D pipes within laser-scan-acquired point clouds. The core algorithm utilizes the Hough transform’s efficacy for detecting parametric shapes in noisy data by applying it to projections of orthogonal slices to grow cylindrical pipe shapes within a 3D point-cloud. This supports faster and less-expensive built-facility modeling. It is validated using laser-scanner data from construction of the Engineering-VI building on the University of Waterloo campus. The system works on a typical laptop. Recognition results are within a few millimeters to centimeters accuracy in accordance with the chosen tessellation of the Hough space. Broad applications to pipe-network modeling are possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it