MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978581741 · doi:10.1891/1062-8061.14.203

Mildred Tuttle: Private Initiative and Public Response in Nursing Education After World War II

2006· article· en· W1978581741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing History Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattlePoliticsPolitical scienceHealth careNurse educationPublic administrationPrivate sectorSociologyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I have long reflected on the complicated intersection between private sector initiatives and public policy, especially as it relates to nursing and health care here in the United States. We really have no overarching philosophy of health care in this country. Only rarely do we achieve political consensus leading to large-scale planned change. But we do muddle along, trying to respond to problems that strain the social fabric and worry us. One traditional approach to solving social problems is through private initiatives or projects undertaken by people or organizations with a special interest or stake in a given problem. These days we call interested parties stakeholders in a slightly pejorative way. But if these private initiatives can attract public favor, political support, and funding, they sometimes lead to significant policy changes. This paper is about a private/public initiative in nursing in the decades after World War II. This particular initiative helped stimulate the reorganization and redefinition of nursing education at midcentury. The paper calls attention to nurses who engineered it and the problems they encountered, and offers a glimpse at their impact on the present. A central but little-known figure in the postwar story is a nurse named Mildred Turtle. Her name is not familiar in the history of American nursing, but Mildred Turtle exerted important influence over the 1950s and 1960s from her position as director of the Nursing Division of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation in Battle Creek, Michigan. From 1943 until 1968, she oversaw grant making for as much as 20 to 30 percent of the Foundation's constantly expanding philanthropy. Almost all this money went to nursing projects in the United States, Latin America, and Canada.1 The long-standing involvement of the Kellogg Foundation with nursing is a larger story. For this paper, I want to focus on Tuttle's postwar plans for nursing. I am relying on the minutes of her Nurse Advisory Committee, her correspondence, and the recollections of participants on the Nurse Advisory Committee who I interviewed during the 1980s and 1990s.2 Mildred Tuttle and Post-World War II Nursing Mildred Tuttle was from Ohio. She began studies in music, but she ultimately earned her bachelor's degree in nursing at Western Reserve University in Cleveland. She practiced as a public health nurse for about six years before joining the Kellogg Foundation Community Healdi Education project in Hastings, Michigan, in 1932. Here she worked with Marguerite Wales, a leading figure in public health nursing from the Henry Street Settlement in New York City. In Hastings she met Emory Morris, a local dentist who also cared for patients in the Kellogg project. Later, Mildred earned a master's degree in education from Peabody College in Nashville, Tennessee, and did field experience at the East Harlem Nursing and Health Service in New York City. In 1940, she completed a second master's degree in public health nursing and returned to Battle Creek. By this time she was a well-known figure in public health nursing, well educated, and also well respected by the small group of local men selected by William K. Kellogg to develop his Midwestern foundation based on funds from his cereal company. When, in 1943, Kellogg picked Emory Morris, the aforementioned dentist, to be president of the Foundation, Morris in turn picked Tuttle to head the Nursing Division. Morris was very interested in nursing, and would fully support her efforts for the next twenty years. As World War II came to an end, a few nurses in the United States saw an opportunity to make sweeping changes in how nurses were educated and in the very nature of nurses' work. They saw that advances in medical knowledge and technology and rising demands for higher-quality health care completely overwhelmed the capacities of the existing hospital-based educational system for nurses. The American public was also interested in the state of nursing after the war. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it