Modular Synthesis of Polyferrocenylsilane Block Copolymers by Cu-Catalyzed Alkyne/Azide “Click” Reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports a new synthetic strategy for the preparation of polyferrocenylsilane (PFS) block copolymers. The block copolymers were prepared by Cu-catalyzed alkyne/azide cycloaddition of two homopolymer precursors that allows access to new functional PFS block copolymers (e.g., polyferrocenylsilane- block -poly( N -isopropylacrylamide)) (PFS- b -PNIPAM)). Trimethylsilyl-protected, alkyne-terminated PFS homopolymer was first prepared via living anionic polymerization, terminating living PFS with commercially available 4-[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]benzaldehyde. Subsequent deprotection of the trimethylsilyl group with NaOMe yielded the ethynyl-terminated PFS (ω-alkyne-PFS). This method should be readily applicable to other polymers prepared by living anionic polymerization. Subsequently, non-PFS homopolymers containing a complementary “clickable” azide functional group were synthesized either by anionic polymerization, modification of a commercially available polymer, or atom transfer radical polymerization via two different approaches. In an azide postpolymerization modification approach, polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were functionalized by azide substitution of the terminal halide after ATRP. Alternatively, the azide moiety was incorporated into the ATRP initiator prior to polymerization, e.g., to give PNIPAM-N 3 and poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA-N 3 ). Finally, the alkyne-terminated PFS segment and the azide functionalized counter block were coupled through the formation of a 1,2,3-triazole ring. In this report, PFS- b -PNIPAM, PFS- b -PDMAEMA, PFS- b -PS, PFS- b -PMMA, PFS- b -polydimethylsiloxane, and PFS- block -poly(ethylene oxide) have been synthesized via this convenient modular protocol in high yield and high purity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".