MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978875361 · doi:10.1109/services.2010.91

Moving Text Analysis Tools to the Cloud

2010· article· en· W1978875361 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCenter for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMinistry of Advanced Education, Government of Alberta
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Cloud computingComputer scienceTask (project management)Data scienceWorld Wide WebTag cloudText processingInformation retrievalArtificial intelligenceVisualizationEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text analysis is an important computational task, as unstructured data including text abound and can potentially provide interesting information and knowledge in a variety of areas. In our collaboration with Digital Humanists, we have started to examine the opportunities that the cloud offers to improving the response times of text-analysis tools so that users can comparatively analyze large text corpora across a variety of dimensions. To that end, we have started migrating existing text analysis tools to the cloud, beginning with TAPoR, the Text Analysis Portal for Research. In this paper, we discuss our experience redesigning and re-implementing four basic TAPoR operations on Hadoop and we report on the performance improvements enabled by the migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207