MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978933280 · doi:10.1142/s021812741350154x

AN APPLICATION OF REGULAR CHAIN THEORY TO THE STUDY OF LIMIT CYCLES

2013· article· en· W1978933280 on OpenAlexafffund
Changbo Chen, Robert M. Corless, Marc Moreno Maza, Pei Yu, Yiming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsLimit (mathematics)ComputationLimit cyclePolynomialQuadratic equationModular designPlanarFocus (optics)Applied mathematicsSingular point of a curveMathematical analysisComputer scienceAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the theory of regular chains and a triangular decomposition method relying on modular computations are presented in order to symbolically solve multivariate polynomial systems. Based on the focus values for dynamic systems obtained by using normal form theory, this method is applied to compute the limit cycles bifurcating from Hopf critical points. In particular, a quadratic planar polynomial system is used to demonstrate the solving process and to show how to obtain center conditions. The modular computations based on regular chains are applied to a cubic planar polynomial system to show the computation efficiency of this method, and to obtain all real solutions of nine limit cycles around a singular point. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first article to simultaneously provide a complete, rigorous proof for the existence of nine limit cycles in a cubic system and all real solutions for these limit cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207