MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978933280 · doi:10.1142/s021812741350154x

AN APPLICATION OF REGULAR CHAIN THEORY TO THE STUDY OF LIMIT CYCLES

2013· article· en· W1978933280 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsLimit (mathematics)ComputationLimit cyclePolynomialQuadratic equationModular designPlanarFocus (optics)Applied mathematicsSingular point of a curveMathematical analysisComputer scienceAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the theory of regular chains and a triangular decomposition method relying on modular computations are presented in order to symbolically solve multivariate polynomial systems. Based on the focus values for dynamic systems obtained by using normal form theory, this method is applied to compute the limit cycles bifurcating from Hopf critical points. In particular, a quadratic planar polynomial system is used to demonstrate the solving process and to show how to obtain center conditions. The modular computations based on regular chains are applied to a cubic planar polynomial system to show the computation efficiency of this method, and to obtain all real solutions of nine limit cycles around a singular point. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first article to simultaneously provide a complete, rigorous proof for the existence of nine limit cycles in a cubic system and all real solutions for these limit cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it