MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978944051 · doi:10.1353/ari.2014.0025

Post-War Anglophone Lebanese Fiction: Home Matters in the Diaspora by Syrine Hout (review)

2014· article· en· W1978944051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAriel · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaHybridityIronyIdeologyHistorySpanish Civil WarPoliticsHomelandGender studiesSociologyLiteratureArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Post-War Anglophone Lebanese Fiction: Home Matters in the Diaspora by Syrine Hout Luma Balaa (bio) Syrine Hout. Post-War Anglophone Lebanese Fiction: Home Matters in the Diaspora. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2012. Pp. 246. US$63.70. Syrine Hout identifies a “new literary and cultural trend” (11) in eleven works of fiction by six novelists from the Lebanese diasporas in the United States, Britain, Canada, and Australia: Rabih Alameddine and Patricia Sarrafian Ward (Lebanese American), Tony Hanania and Nathalie Abi-Ezzi (Lebanese British), Rawi Hage (Lebanese Canadian), and Nada Awar Jarrar (Lebanese Australian). All of these authors write in English about the civil war, their experiences of “home,” and exile. Hout reads their novels as illustrations of “imaginative” returns and argues that they manifest the idea of cultural hybridity “not only on the levels of languages, settings and themes, but most prominently in a state, or a predicament, of in-betweenness which reflects a complex consciousness characterised by mixed modes and moods, such as irony, parody, satire, nostalgia and sentimentality” (9). Hout divides her book into four parts according to the novels’ protagonists’ experiences of home and exile. In Part I, each chapter compares a nostalgic text with a nostophobic one. Chapter one contrasts Alameddine’s Koolaids: The Art of War (1998) with Hanania’s Unreal City (1999). The former is nostalgic while the latter is critical of home. However, both define nation and home not by political ideology but by an “emotional reality” (15), strongly influenced by the father-son relationship, that goes beyond the notion of homeland as nation. These texts reveal that exile and nation are not opposing realities but a state of cultural inbetweenness. Chapter two draws on Svetlana Boym’s work on nostalgia and Leo Spitzer’s work on memory and discusses works that deal with questions of exile, diaspora, home, and identity from opposing angles. Alameddine’s The Perv: Stories (1999) represents a “sickness of home” that is a result of both “ironic nostalgia” and “critical memory” (Hout 15); in contrast, Jarrar’s Somewhere, Home (2003) symbolizes a “homesickness” that is a result of “tender nostalgia” and “nostalgic memory” (Hout 15). Part II of Hout’s text draws on trauma studies by writers such as Cathy Caruth and Anne Whitehead and compares Ward’s The Bullet Collection (2003) with Alameddine’s I, the Divine: A Novel in First Chapters (2001). In Ward’s novel, Marianna sees herself as “fully” Lebanese and cannot adjust to exile, whereas Sarah, a character in Alameddine’s novel, is half American [End Page 171] and finds herself in between homes. Although both novels represent the catastrophic effect of the civil war on its victims, The Bullet Collection is nostalgic while I, the Divine is anti-nostalgic. The two authors were “too young at the time to translate their fears and hopes into writing” (Hout 12). Both, Hout argues, use conventions of trauma narrative such as indirection, fragmentation, and temporal disorientation. She observes that since young war survivors often want to remember the traumatic past while older ones tend to want to forget it, the texts provide an “anti-amnesiac and generation-specific testimony to the long-term effects of the Lebanese Civil War” (11). In Lebanon, Hout suggests, “state-sponsored forgetfulness becomes a strategy to suppress political memory” (2). By describing their traumatic war experiences, the authors go against the nation’s trend of collective amnesia. Part III of the text deals with novels that Hout contends represent childhood traumas that result from combat and the hazards of correlating manhood with militarism. Each chapter explores depictions of impoverished youths who join militias because they cannot afford to leave Lebanon during the civil war. Chapter four studies Alameddine’s The Hakawati (2008) and Abi-Ezzi’s A Girl Made of Dust (2008). Both texts revisit the psycho-social effects of the civil war, particularly children’s loss of innocence. When teenagers join militias at home, fraternal bonds with their fellow partisans replace familial bonds. Hage’s De Niro’s Game (2006), the subject of chapter five, investigates themes of military participation, political extremism, and family relations across generations. Two seventeen-year-old Lebanese friends, Bassam and George, face...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it