MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979046722 · doi:10.1109/icme.2003.1220967

Centralized peer-to-peer streaming with layered video

2003· article· en· W1979046722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityComputer networkCodecQuality of serviceDiscrete cosine transformMultiple description codingRobustness (evolution)ServerThe InternetPeer-to-peerVideo streamingDistributed computingReal-time computingComputer hardwareOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faster computational power and higher network bandwidth facilitates Internet applications to improve the way we live, work and play. For video streaming applications, it is a challenge to provide the scalability while maintaining the central manageability and the robustness. In this paper, we propose the centralized peer-to-peer streaming protocol (P2PSP), which features the centralized management, guaranteed perceived quality of service (PQoS), while decentralized the traffic loads. To evaluate the protocol, a layered video coding technique based on 3D discrete cosine transform (DCT) is designed. This codec applies self-organizing tree map (SOTM) to generate cascaded vector quantization codebooks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the centralized P2PSP by comparing the video streaming simulations under the proposed architecture and the client/server architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207