MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979079776 · doi:10.2118/148803-ms

Numerical Simulation of SAGD with Vertical Slimholes

2011· article· en· W1979079776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Innovates
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleum engineeringOil shaleAsphaltGeologyDrillingDirectional drillingSteam injectionSaturation (graph theory)Permeability (electromagnetism)Oil in placePetroleumEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam assisted gravity drainage is the primary in-situ recovery method for bitumen from the large Athabasca deposit in Alberta, Canada. SAGD field operations encounter a significant decrease in production performance when low permeability shale barriers are present in the formation. These layers can reduce SAGD performance and impede the growth of the steam chamber. They also significantly limit the percentage of the deposit where bitumen can be economically recovered with SAGD. The concept of drilling vertical slimholes to create flow paths through barriers was conceived and investigated at Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures (formerly the Alberta Research Council). Use of slimholes has the potential to significantly increase the amount of recoverable bitumen (reserves) and the rate at which it is produced during SAGD. For shallow reservoirs, the slimholes could be drilled from the surface at relatively low cost. 2-D and 3-D field scale numerical simulations were performed using reservoir properties and operating conditions that were based on published information for the MacKay River SAGD operation in the Athabasca deposit. The reservoir depth was 135 m, the initial pressure 500 kPaa, the initial temperature 7.5 °C, and the initial oil saturation 0.8. The simulations explored the impact of vertical slimholes, which were 7 m laterally offset from the horizontal well pair (Figure 1), on reservoirs with and without shale layers or shale lenses. The effect on SAGD performance of slimhole cross-section (25 cm × 25 cm or 50 cm × 50 cm) and distance between slimholes (12 m or 24 m in the direction parallel to the well pair was investigated). The effect of reservoir and slimhole permeability and the impact of horizontal slimholes from the injector or producer were also explored. The slimholes were represented by high permeability vertical channels using refined grids. Counter-current flow of gas and liquid through the slimholes was represented by adjusting the relative permeability in the slimholes. For a reservoir, with a continuous shale layer, SAGD performance was improved by vertical slimholes due to the recovery of previously inaccessible oil from above the shale layer where a secondary steam chamber was formed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it