Actuator fault diagnosis for uncertain linear systems using a high‐order sliding‐mode robust differentiator (HOSMRD)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Many observer‐based fault diagnosis strategies proposed for linear systems, subject to unknown inputs, operate based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that the system under consideration is at least detectable. The second one is that the unknown inputs satisfy certain matching conditions. The third one, which is often implicit, is that the relative degrees from the generalized input vector, including both known and unknown inputs, to the outputs are no larger than one. If none of these assumptions are met, little result exists on how to carry out fault diagnosis. The purpose of this paper is to develop a novel actuator fault diagnosis scheme for a general class of linear systems subject to unknown inputs that can work without the mentioned three assumptions. Four actuator fault diagnosis problems related to fault detection, isolation, and estimation are formulated and studied. In order to solve these problems, an input–output relation, which involves only the outputs and their higher‐order derivatives, is derived. The posed problems are solved based on this relation via utilizing both the outputs and their higher‐order derivatives. Because only the outputs are measured, higher‐order output derivatives are estimated using the recently developed high‐order sliding‐mode robust differentiators (HOSMRDs). The first two fault detection and isolation problems are answered in terms of a concept called Generalized Actuator Fault Isolation IndeX (GAFIX), and it is proved that, under the condition that the derived input–output relation is used for fault diagnosis, actuator faults are detectable if and only if GAFIX⩾1, and l actuator faults can be isolated if and only if GAFIX⩾ l +1. A method which can be used to estimate the faults is proposed for the fault estimation problem. To solve the last problem, an actuator fault diagnosis scheme is designed using both the measured outputs and their estimated derivatives obtained by HOSMRDs, and is presented in steps. Finally, an example is provided to show the effectiveness of our fault diagnosis scheme in terms of fault detection, isolation, and estimation. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it