Design and characterization of single- and multiple-beam mm-wave circularly polarized substrate lens antennas for wireless communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single- and multiple-beam circularly polarized ellipsoidal substrate lenses suitable for millimeter-wave wireless communications have been designed, implemented, and experimentally characterized at 30 GHz. The lenses are made out of low-cost low-permittivity Rexolite material. The single-beam lens achieves a directivity of 25.9 dB, a front-to-back ratio of 30 dB, and an axial ratio of 0.5 dB is maintained within the main lobe. The measured impedance bandwidth is 12.5% within a SWR/spl les/1.8:1. The single-beam antenna is well suited for broad-band wireless point-to-point links. On the other hand, the multiple-beam lens launches 31 beams with a minimum 3-dB overlapping level among adjacent beams. The coverage of the lens antenna system has been optimized through the utilization of a hexagonal patch arrangement leading to a scan coverage of 45.4/spl deg/ with a maximum loss in directivity of 1.8 dB due to multiple reflections. The multiple-beam lens antenna is suitable for indoor point-to-multipoint wireless communications such as a broad-band local area network or as a switched beam smart antenna. During the proposed design process, some fundamental issues pertaining to substrate lens antennas are discussed and clarified. This includes the depolarization properties of the lenses, the effect of multiple internal reflections on the far-field patterns and the directivity, the nature of the far-field patterns, the estimation of the lens system F/B ratio, and the off-axis characteristics of ellipsoidal lenses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it