MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979726231 · doi:10.1080/00268970110118240

The magnetic field dependence of the electron spin polarization in consecutive spin correlated radical pairs in type I photosynthetic reaction centres

2002· article· en· W1979726231 on OpenAlexaff
Yu. E. Kandrashkin, W. Vollmann, D. Stehlik, К. М. Салихов, Art van der Est

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeeman effectSinglet stateChemistryElectron paramagnetic resonanceTriplet statePhotosynthetic reaction centrePhotosystem IIZeeman energyMagnetic fieldPolarization (electrochemistry)Field strengthSpin polarizationElectronMolecular physicsAtomic physicsPhysicsPhotochemistryElectron transferNuclear magnetic resonanceExcited statePhotosynthesisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetic field/microwave frequency dependence of the spin polarized EPR spectra of the sequential spin correlated radical pairs P+A− 1 and P+F− x in type I photosynthetic reaction centres is investigated. Experimental data are presented for photosystem (PS) I and reaction centres of heliobacteria at × band (9.7 GHz) and K band (24 GHz). In photosystem I at ambient temperatures the lifetime of A − 1 is ~290 ns and both states are observable by transient EPR. In heliobacteria, electron transfer to Fx occurs within ~600 ps and only the state P+F− x is observed. The experimental data show a net polarization of P+ in the state P+F− x, which displays a clear dependence on the strength of the external field. The net polarization generated in sequential radical pairs is expected to pass through a maximum as a function of the Zeeman energy when the characteristic time of singlet-triplet mixing is comparable with the lifetime of the precursor. In PS I, the precursor lifetime (290ns) is much longer than the characteristic time of singlet-triplet mixing at × band (9 GHz, 3 kG) and K band (24 GHz, 8 kG). As a result, the observable net polarization decreases with the field strength in this region. In contrast, in heliobacteria, the precursor lifetime (600 ps) is much shorter than the characteristic time of singlet-triplet mixing, and the net polarization increases in the same range of Zeeman energies. The polarization patterns in these two systems can be described using the specific limiting cases of a short lived and long lived precursor radical pair and written as a sum of several contributions. The spectra are simulated on this basis using parameters derived entirely from independent experimental data, and good agreement between the experimental polarization patterns is obtained. The calculated polarization patterns are sensitive to spin dynamics on a timescale much shorter than the spectrometer response time, and the expected influence of a 10 ns component in the electron transfer, as observed optically in some PS I, preparations is discussed. No significant influence from such a component is found in the spin polarization patterns of PS I from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis 6803.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207