Automated refinement of conformal quadrilateral and hexahedral meshes
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
- Genre
- Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: Methods
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.283
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.339
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Abstract Conformal refinement using a shrink and connect strategy, known as pillowing or buffer insertion, contracts and reconnects contiguous elements of an all‐quadrilateral or an all‐hexahedral mesh in order to locally increase vertex density without introducing hanging nodes or non‐cubical elements. Using layers as shrink sets, the present method automates the anisotropic refinement of such meshes according to a prescribed size map expressed as a Riemannian metric field. An anisotropic smoother further enhances vertex clustering to capture the features of the metric. Both two‐ and three‐dimensional test cases with analytic control metrics confirm the feasibility of the present approach and explore strategies to minimize the trade‐off between element shape quality and size conformity. Additional examples using discrete metric maps illustrate possible practical applications. Although local vertex removal and reconnection capabilities have yet to be developed, the present refinement method is a step towards an automated tool for conformal adaptation of all‐quadrilateral and all‐hexahedral meshes. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
- Topic
- Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
- Field
- Computer Science
- Canadian institutions
- Polytechnique MontréalCompute Canada
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
- Keywords
- HexahedronQuadrilateralPolygon meshConformal mapVertex (graph theory)Metric (unit)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceDiscretizationAlgorithmMathematicsFinite element methodGeometryComputational scienceMathematical analysisTheoretical computer scienceEngineeringCombinatoricsStructural engineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes