MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979878366 · doi:10.5172/impp.2012.14.1.19

Enabling innovation in extractive industries in commodity based economies

2012· article· en· W1979878366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMinistry of Education, Science and TechnologyDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsProfitability indexCommodityNatural resourceSustainabilityBusinessCorporate governanceSample (material)EconomicsEconomyMarket economyEconomic system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As dependence on the extraction of natural resources seems inevitable in the short- and even medium-term perspective, commodity based economies will face the need to increase the sustainability and profitability of their extractive industries. This paper sets out to analyze the R&D policies of Brazil, Russia and South Africa, and benchmark them against the sizeable and innovative extractive industry of Canada.Although the countries in our sample have similar economic features, we stress the differences between their social and economic stage of development. The particularities in each country’s economic situation at times correspond with a different policy mix. Besides that, there are not many differences in the innovation policy instruments used in an economically advanced country vs. fast-growing economies. Rather, it is their synergy, governance, targeted design and application that make the difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it