Performance Analysis of Fixed Gain Relay Systems With a Single Interferer in Nakagami- $m$ Fading Channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the outage probability and average bit error rate (BER) of a dual-hop fixed gain relaying system in the presence of interference and noise at the relay and destination. Our analysis assumes Nakagami-m fading for the source-relay, relay-destination, and interfering channels. We present new closed-form/series expressions for the outage probability, as well as the average BER. It is concluded that the presence of interference results in a floor point in both outage and BER performance. This floor point holds for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values higher than a certain threshold such that the larger the difference between the received powers of the useful and interfering signals, the higher the SNR value at which this floor point commences. Moreover, it is shown that the performance is practically not affected by the Nakagami-m shape parameter of the fading at the interfering link.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it