MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adhesion-Related Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions

2006· article· en· W1980443299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBowel obstructionLaparotomyHysterectomyAdhesionSurgeryAbdominal hysterectomyAbdomenLaparoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of small bowel obstruction after hysterectomy. METHODS: Analysis of 326 cases of women who were admitted with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction during the period 1998-2005. Among cases with small bowel obstruction after hysterectomy for benign conditions, we evaluated the type and technique of hysterectomy and whether the parietal peritoneum was sutured at the completion of the procedure. RESULTS: The main causes of bowel obstruction were intra-abdominal adhesions (41.9%) and abdominal malignancy (40.1%). After excluding oncologic cases, we found that, of 135 cases of adhesion-related small bowel obstruction, gynecologic operations played the largest role in the occurrence of bowel obstruction (n=68, 50.4%). Among all gynecologic operations for benign conditions, total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) was the most common cause of small bowel obstruction (13.6 per 1,000 TAHs). We did not encounter small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The reduction in absolute risk of small bowel obstruction from TAH to laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is 13.6 per 1,000 cases; 73 patients would undergo laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy to prevent one small bowel obstruction. The median interval between TAH and small bowel obstruction was 4 years. The adhesions were adherent to the previous laparotomy incision in 27 cases (75%) and to the vaginal vault in nine cases (25%). Peritoneal closure was not associated with small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy plays a major role in the occurrence of adhesion-related small bowel obstruction. Closure of the parietal peritoneum does not contribute to the occurrence of adhesion-related small bowel obstruction, and small bowel obstruction rarely occurs after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it