MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980964143 · doi:10.1504/ijwgs.2006.008879

Analytical comparisons of switching of web services and switching of service offerings

2006· article· en· W1980964143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Web and Grid Services · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeb serviceComputer scienceAdaptation (eye)Service (business)WS-PolicyComplement (music)SOAPDistributed computingWorld Wide WebWeb developmentWeb application securityBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic (run-time) adaptation of web service compositions (choreographies and orchestrations) is needed to accommodate various changes and disturbances like poor performance of composed web services. We explain in detail a novel analytical methodology for comparing various approaches to dynamic adaptation of web service compositions. This methodology is based on comparing the number of exchanged SOAP messages. Furthermore, we present formulae generated by this methodology for switching of web services and switching of service offerings (classes of service). These formulae quantify the extent to which switching of service offerings is faster and simpler. The presented results complement previous publications that discussed the corresponding experimental comparisons of dynamic adaptation approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it