MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981227783 · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.4.12520

The role of the immune system in regulating the microbiota

2010· article· en· W1981227783 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGut Microbes · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyImmune systemHost (biology)PopulationMicrobiomeGut floraCommensalismDiseaseGastrointestinal tractImmunologyBacteriaEcologyBioinformaticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A diverse population of bacteria, archaea and fungi, collectively known as the microbiota, abounds within the gastrointestinal tract of the mammalian host. This microbial population makes many important contributions to host physiology through inter-kingdom signalling and by providing nutrients that have both local and systemic effects. In a healthy state the overall host-microbial interaction is symbiotic; however, a growing number of diseases have been associated with a dysregulated microbiota. To avoid these consequences, the host exerts substantial effort to maintain proper regulation of the microbiota with respect to localization and composition. Although important to maintaining microbial balance, the host immune response can also be the cause of a disrupted microbiota, contributing to disease severity. Here, we discuss the role of the host in both maintaining and disrupting a balanced gastrointestinal microbiota.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it