MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981235595 · doi:10.1130/g22678a.1

Crystal molds on Mars: Melting of a possible new mineral species to create Martian chaotic terrain

2006· article· en· W1981235595 on OpenAlexafffundabout
R. C. Peterson, Ruiyao Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMartianMars Exploration ProgramCitationGeologyTerrainLibrary scienceEarth scienceComputer scienceAstrobiologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| November 01, 2006 Crystal molds on Mars: Melting of a possible new mineral species to create Martian chaotic terrain Ronald C. Peterson; Ronald C. Peterson 1Department of Geological Science and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ruiyao Wang Ruiyao Wang 2Department of Chemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ronald C. Peterson 1Department of Geological Science and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Ruiyao Wang 2Department of Chemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 08 Feb 2006 Revision Received: 06 Jun 2006 Accepted: 09 Jun 2006 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 The Geological Society of America, Inc. Geology (2006) 34 (11): 957–960. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22678A.1 Article history Received: 08 Feb 2006 Revision Received: 06 Jun 2006 Accepted: 09 Jun 2006 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ronald C. Peterson, Ruiyao Wang; Crystal molds on Mars: Melting of a possible new mineral species to create Martian chaotic terrain. Geology 2006;; 34 (11): 957–960. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G22678A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Images sent back by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity from the Meridiani Planum show sulfate-rich rocks containing plate-shaped voids with tapered edges that are interpreted as crystal molds formed after a late-stage evaporite mineral has been removed. Experimental studies of the MgSO4-H2O system at low temperatures reveal that the triclinic phase MgSO4·11H2O exhibits a crystal morphology that matches the shapes of these molds. MgSO4·11H2O melts incongruently above 2 °C to a mixture of 70% epsomite (MgSO4·7H2O) and 30% H2O by volume. When this occurs while crystals are encased in sediment, plate-shaped voids remain. The existence of ice, low surface temperatures, and the high sulfate content of surface rocks and soil on Mars makes MgSO4·11H2O a possible mineral species near the surface at high latitudes or elsewhere in the subsurface. If an evaporite layer contained a significant amount of this phase, incongruent melting would result in a rapid release of a large volume of water and could explain some of the landform features on Mars that are interpreted as outflow channels. MgSO4·11H2O would not survive a sample return mission unless extraordinary precautions were taken. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207