MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981240816 · doi:10.1109/ccgrid.2005.1558540

Clusters and security: distributed security for distributed systems

2005· article· en· W1981240816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsResearch CanadaEricsson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster (spacecraft)ServerDistributed System Security ArchitectureSecurity serviceComputer securityCommodityComputer security modelCloud computing securityField (mathematics)Security information and event managementSecurity through obscurityInformation securityBusinessComputer networkCloud computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale commodity clusters are used in an increasing number of domains: academic, research, and industrial environments. At the same time, these clusters are exposed to an increasing number of attacks coming from public networks. Therefore, mechanisms for efficiently and flexibly managing security have now become an essential requirement for clusters. However, despite the growing importance of cluster security, this field has been only minimally addressed by contemporary cluster administration techniques. This paper presents a high-level view of existing security challenges related to clusters and proposes a structured approach for handling security in clustered servers. The goal of this paper is to identify various necessarily-distributed security services and their related characteristics as a means of enhancing cluster security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it