A fuzzy logic based bio-inspired system for mobile robot navigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new path planning method for mobile robots in unknown environments. The structure of the proposed algorithm is a hybrid fuzzy logic neural networks, and hence it benefits from the potentials of these two techniques. For modeling the mobile robot, the proposed system adopts the Braitenberg's automata models that were developed for agents. Wheels of the robot are represented by a bio-inspired neuron of a neural network, where each wheel receives different sensor inputs indicating different signals from either excitatory or inhibitory synapses. Training of the neural network weighting is automatically achieved through the fuzzy system that is developed to adjust the weighting between each synapse and neuron of the network. To assess the performance of the developed algorithm, simulation results are presented. It was shown that the proposed method can successfully navigate the robot to the target, and turn the robot at corners for given desired angles. The methodology proposed herein improves the Braitenberg navigation scheme and offers insights into using biologically inspired systems for path planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it