Study of Workpiece Temperature Distribution in the Contact Zone during Robotic Grinding Process Using Finite Element Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grinding is traditionally categorized as a finishing process in manufacturing. However, more recently it has been used as a machining process as well. Temperature distribution is crucial for investigation of thermal softening effects in the material removal process and thermal damages on the surface of workpiece. One important aspect to be considered in thermal simulations of robotic grinding is the dynamic behavior of the robot which can have significant influences on the process, especially in those performed with low stiffness robots. Most of the earlier thermal simulations of grinding processes are based on a simplified heat sourc e function representing the grinding wheel effect. In this study, heat generation due to a robotic grinding operation is distributed based on the local chip thickness and friction effect over the corresponding contact zone at the workpiece interface. The calculation of the chip thickness is based on a wear model of the grinding wheel in accordance with an impact-cutting behavior, observed with a high speed camera in our laboratory. Temperature distribution in the workpiece is simulated with a 3D transient thermal finite element (FE) code. Special attention is given to consider the dynamic effect of impact-cutting on the process which is caused by the high rotational speed of the wheel and low stiffness of the robot as a tool holder. Element deletion technique is used to represent the material removed from the workpiece and a well known model of the energy partition ratio is used and modified for the amount of energy entering into the workpiece. Grinding experiments conducted with a flexible robot showed a good agreement among simulation results and measured temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it