MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981572337 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.06.166

Monitoring Winter Ice Conditions Using Thermal Imaging Cameras Equipped with Infrared Microbolometer Sensors

2012· article· en· W1981572337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobolometerPermafrostSnow coverRemote sensingSnowInfraredEnvironmental scienceThermalThermal infraredSnowmeltComputer scienceGeologyMeteorologyBolometerOceanographyGeomorphologyOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snow cover duration and thickness affects the permafrost thermal state, the depth and timing of seasonal soil freeze/thaw/break-up, and melting of on land and sea ice. Monitoring the ice conditions in lakes and rivers during a winter season is critical for the safety of people living in those regions. Infrared cameras equipped with microbolometer sensors, placed near lakes and rivers during winter, captures and send those thermal images wirelessly to a server, where image processing and analysis algorithms measure the ice conditions in real-time. This study presents results from an ice classification system using captured ice images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it