MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981594973 · doi:10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1387

Polynomial identities for ternary intermolecular recombination

2011· preprint· en· W1981594973 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Mathematical Society
KeywordsTernary operationHermite polynomialsIntermolecular forceMathematicsLattice reductionBinary numberBasis (linear algebra)GeneralizationCombinatoricsRecombinationReduction (mathematics)PolynomialInteger matrixDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsMoleculeComputer sciencePhysicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsSymmetric matrixArithmeticGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The operation of binary intermolecular recombination, originating in the theory of DNAcomputing, permits a natural generalization to $n$-ary operations which performsimultaneous recombination of $n$ molecules. In the case $n = 3$, we use computeralgebra to determine the polynomial identities of degree $\le 9$ satisfied by this trilinearnonassociative operation. Our approach requires computing a basis for the nullspace ofa large integer matrix, and for this we compare two methods: the row canonical form, andthe Hermite normal form with lattice basis reduction. In the conclusion, we formulatesome conjectures for the general case of $n$-ary intermolecular recombination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it