MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981650867 · doi:10.1080/13527250600726887

That Impulse that Bids a People to Honour its Past: The Nature and Purpose of Centennial Celebrations

2006· article· en· W1981650867 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heritage Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionPrideCentennialHonourHistoriographyHistoryNationalismCompetition (biology)Political scienceEconomic historyArt historyLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although there are instances of significant anniversaries being celebrated as early as the 17th century, it was Britain’s Great Exhibition of 1851 that started the fashion for large‐scale ‘expositions’ that lasted for up to six months. The success of the Great Exhibition prompted other countries to try and replicate it, most notably the USA, which was able to bring together a strong nationalist dimension with an opportunity to make money. By analysing the historiography of centennials and the variety of reasons for holding them from the 17th century to the 21st, this article argues that they continue to instil and promote pride in locality, region and nation despite growing competition from the major international sporting championships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it