MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981703298 · doi:10.1007/s11067-010-9136-5

Introduction to the Special Issue on Location Modeling

2010· article· en· W1981703298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNetworks and Spatial Economics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperations researchHeuristicsComputer scienceTabu searchHeuristicPoint (geometry)Simulated annealingIndustrial engineeringGeographyEngineeringMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 2009 marked the centennial of Alfred Weber's (1909) Theory of the Location of Industries, which more than any other single publication launched the field of Location Science.In the ensuing 100 years, the field has changed dramatically.The hand-drawn concentric circles and mechanical devices of the early 20th century were rendered obsolete by the invention of linear programming, digital computers, branch-and-bound, and GIS.On the computational side, simple but efficient greedy, substitution, and Lagrangean-relaxation heuristics have been augmented by newer developments in simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, ant colony optimization, Tabu search, heuristic concentration, as well as other approaches.Models for industrial factories and warehouses now occupy a small space in the field, having been joined by public sector facility location, emergency vehicle posting, special concerns for undesirable and obnoxious facilities, and countless other point, line, and areal facility problems.Researchers have explored different solution spaces (planar, network, discrete, spherical, and hybrid), numerous objectives (single vs. multiple), temporal aspects (static vs. dynamic), the nature of demand (point, planar, path flows), and other problem dimensions.Location researchers approach these issues from a variety of backgrounds: economics, engineering, geography, mathematics and operations research from both academic and business points of view.To bring these varied specialists together, Jonathan Halpern and Michael Goodchild, launched the International Symposium on Locational Decisions (ISOLDE) in 1978, which was held in Banff, Alberta.This symposium has been held every three years since 1978 for an intensive week focused solely on location decision-making.The papers in this special issue of Networks and Spatial Economics are expanded and refined treatments of topics identified at ISOLDE XI, held in Santa Barbara CA in 2008, as central to current scholarly inquiry into locational decisions.However, in no sense are

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it