Carbon Dioxide in the Critically Ill: Too Much or Too Little of a Good Thing?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypercapnia and hypocapnia commonly complicate conditions that are present in critically ill patients. Both conditions have important physiologic effects that may impact the clinical management of these patients. For instance, hypercapnia results in bronchodilation and enhanced hypoxic vasoconstriction, leading to improved ventilation/perfusion matching. Hypocapnia reduces cerebral blood volume through arterial vasoconstriction. These effects have also been exploited for therapeutic aims. In patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypocapnia is often utilized to control intracranial pressure. However, this effect is not sustained, and prolonged hypocapnia increases the risk of mortality and severe disability in patients with TBI. Hypercapnia and hypercapnic acidosis are common consequences of lung-protective ventilation in ARDS. Hypercapnic acidosis reduces ischemic lung injury and preserves lung compliance, but concern has arisen over hypercapnia-induced immunosuppression and the potential for bacterial proliferation in sepsis. Experimental studies suggest that buffering hypercapnic acidosis attenuates these effects, whereas hypocapnia appears to potentiate lung injury through increased capillary permeability and decreased lung compliance. Several areas of uncertainty surround the role of hypercapnia/hypocapnia in treating TBI and ARDS. Current data support recommendations to avoid hypocapnia in treating TBI, with the exception of emergent treatment of elevated intracranial pressure, while awaiting definitive management. Permissive hypercapnia is commonly accepted as a consequence of lung-protective ventilation in ARDS, but there is insufficient evidence to support the induction of hypercapnic acidosis in clinical practice. Buffering hypercapnic acidosis should be considered only for a specific clinical indication (eg, hemodynamic instability). For clinicians choosing to buffer hypercapnic acidosis, tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane is recommended over sodium bicarbonate, as it is more effective in correcting pH and is not associated with increased carbon dioxide production. Future studies should aim to address these areas of uncertainty to help guide clinicians in the therapeutic use and management of hypercapnia/hypocapnia in critically ill patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".