Modeling the Effects of Backfilling and Soil Compaction beside Shallow Buried Pipes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compaction of the soil placed beside culverts (the side-fill) can have a significant effect on the behavior of flexible and rigid structures. This is particularly true for shallow buried structures when the stresses resulting from compaction represent a greater proportion of the total stresses present. Different techniques have been reported in the literature to model soil compaction during finite-element analyses. A new semiempirical technique is proposed, which takes into consideration the increase in lateral stress and soil kneading during compaction. A simple procedure is discussed to incorporate the compaction of granular material in finite-element analysis. The new technique is used to model five different pipe products composed of different materials and dimensions, and the results are compared to measured values reported in the literature. A new factor is proposed to account for soil kneading during compaction to provide an upper limit for the pipe deformations and stresses that result during installation. The technique can be used to estimate peaking in flexible culverts and the additional crown moments and thrust that result in rigid culverts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it