The Innovest Austrian Pension Fund Financial Planning Model InnoALM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the financial planning model InnoALM we developed at Innovest for the Austrian pension fund of the electronics firm Siemens. The model uses a multiperiod stochastic linear programming framework with a flexible number of time periods of varying length. Uncertainty is modeled using multiperiod discrete probability scenarios for random return and other model parameters. The correlations across asset classes, of bonds, stocks, cash, and other financial instruments, are state dependent using multiple correlation matrices that correspond to differing market conditions. This feature allows InnoALM to anticipate and react to severe as well as normal market conditions. Austrian pension law and policy considerations can be modeled as constraints in the optimization. The concave risk-averse preference function is to maximize the expected present value of terminal wealth at the specified horizon net of expected discounted convex (piecewise-linear) penalty costs for wealth and benchmark targets in each decision period. InnoALM has a user interface that provides visualization of key model outputs, the effect of input changes, growing pension benefits from increased deterministic wealth target violations, stochastic benchmark targets, security reserves, policy changes, etc. The solution process using the IBM OSL stochastic programming code is fast enough to generate virtually online decisions and results and allows for easy interaction of the user with the model to improve pension fund performance. The model has been used since 2000 for Siemens Austria, Siemens worldwide, and to evaluate possible pension fund regulation changes in Austria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".