MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981942575 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6090713

Time-domain ECG signal analysis based on smart-phone

2011· article· en· W1981942575 on OpenAlexaff
Shijie Zhou, Zichen Zhang, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQRS complexFrequency domainBeat (acoustics)Time domainSIGNAL (programming language)Ventricular tachycardiaVentricular fibrillationSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingInternal medicineComputer visionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a time domain algorithm architecture is presented and implemented on a smart-phone for ECG signal analysis. Using the QRS detection algorithm suggested by Pan-Tompkins and the beat classification method, the heart beats are detected and classified as normal beats and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Subsequently, a computationally efficient method is presented to separate ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). This method utilizes Lempel and Ziv complexity analysis combined with K-means algorithm for the coarse-graining process. In addition, a new classification rule is presented to recognize VT and VF in our study. The proposed system provides fairly good performance when applied to the MIT-BIH Database. This algorithm architecture can be efficiently used on the mobile platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207