MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982152664 · doi:10.1353/can.2011.0031

Modernism at a Crossroad: The Spadina Expressway Controversy in Toronto, Ontario ca. 1960-1971

2011· article· en· W1982152664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)Political scienceCivil servantsTown planningModernism (music)HumanitiesSafeguardingUrban planningPublic administrationLawHistoryArt historyArtPoliticsEngineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spadina Expressway controversy in Toronto, Ontario, was sparked by a proposal to run an expressway into the heart of the city. The dispute was part of a broader movement against high modernist planning that swept American and Canadian cities in the 1960s and 1970s. Frustrated by unresponsive politicians and civic officials, citizen activists challenged authorities with an alternate vision for cities that prioritized the safeguarding of the urban environment by preserving communities, preventing environmental degradation, and promoting public transit. By the latter half of the 1960s, citizen activists were no longer fighting alone, as some politicians and civil servants also turned against more traditional modes of city planning. This politicization of urban planning and transportation schemes culminated in the defeat of expressway networks in cities across Canada and the United States, including the Spadina Expressway in 1971. A landmark decision and important precursor to the municipal reform movement that would follow, the legacy of the Spadina episode was nevertheless mixed. La controverse de l'autoroute Spadina à Toronto, en Ontario, a éclaté après qu'on a proposé de faire passer une autoroute au cœur de la ville. La dispute s'est inscrite dans un mouvement plus vaste d'opposition à la planification inspirée du high modernism qui balaya les villes étatsuniennes et canadiennes dans les années 1960 et 1970. Exaspérés d'être ignorés des politiciens et des fonctionnaires municipaux, des activistes citoyens confrontèrent les autorités et proposèrent une autre vision des villes donnant priorité à la sauvegarde du milieu urbain par la préservation des communautés, la prévention de la dégradation environnementale et la promotion du transport en commun. Dans la seconde moitié des années 1960, ces activistes n'eurent plus à se battre seuls, car certains politiciens et fonctionnaires s'opposaient désormais eux aussi aux modes plus traditionnels de planification urbaine. La politisation des plans d'urbanisme et de transport culmina avec la défaite des réseaux autoroutiers dans les villes partout au Canada et aux États-Unis, y compris l'autoroute Spadina en 1971. Décision phare et important précurseur du mouvement de réforme municipale qui allait suivre, l'épisode de l'autoroute Spadina n'en a pas moins eu des répercussions mixtes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it