MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982287781 · doi:10.4043/20498-ms

OTEC Power Efficiency Challenges

2010· article· en· W1982287781 on OpenAlexaff
James Hurtt, Alain Pellen, Nicholas John Nagurny

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcean thermal energy conversionEnvironmental sciencePower stationElectricity generationProcess engineeringSeawaterElectric powerPower (physics)EngineeringSolar energyElectrical engineeringOceanographyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The maximum possible Carnot thermal efficiency of an Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) power system is about 7% as it exploits the water temperature gradient between the surface and the deep ocean, which is only slightly over 20 degree C in tropical waters. The overall efficiency of a multi-megawatt-sized OTEC electrical power plant, all inclusive from seawater to net electric power, is typically around 2%. Only about half of the water temperature gradient can be directly harnessed across the power cycle, as the rest is needed for heat transfer and mass flow to maintain economical heat exchanger and seawater pump sizing. About a third of the gross power generated is consumed pumping seawater, powering auxiliary systems, and in power transmission losses. This paper reviews efficiency as it relates to the OTEC power cycle. OTEC has enormous potential as a source of clean, renewable, and base-load electricity for many nations, territories and states near tropical waters. As OTEC technology matures, large floating OTEC plants are expected to produce energy carriers or synthetic fuels that can be shipped to energy consumers. This paper will provide a current review of the various components used by one OTEC power cycle, their respective efficiencies and their contribution to the overall OTEC power plant economics. A thorough understanding of the efficiency losses, power burden, and potential areas for optimization is critical for OTEC to become an economically viable resource. This paper provides recommendations for the design of the OTEC plant main components and gives guidelines to optimize efficiency such that high quality power can be sold to the utility at competitive rates. Finally, the results of a parametric study of OTEC size in terms of Megawatts produced shows the efficiency gains that can be achieved with large scale OTEC power generation plants. I. Introduction Global energy demand is increasing rapidly. Growing populations and higher standards of living worldwide are pushing the limits of existing energy resources. At the same time hydrocarbon reserves are becoming harder to find. There is growing global concern for energy security and environmental sustainability. Global development and commercialization of renewable technologies is required before existing resources become scarce. For instance: wind energy has been used through the centuries but was surpassed during the Industrial Revolution by coal and oil. However, over the past decade, wind power has seen exponential growth as an energy resource (2009 US DOE). Solar and wind energy have the economic advantage of free " fuel?? but come with the intermittent and variable nature of that " fuel?? source. Ocean thermal energy enjoys the benefit of the large thermal storage of ocean waters and can therefore provide a base-load source of electricity to coastal areas in tropical waters and energy carriers to energy consumers. Figure 1 is a map showing the vast worldwide OTEC resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207