MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982287781 · doi:10.4043/20498-ms

OTEC Power Efficiency Challenges

2010· article· en· W1982287781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcean thermal energy conversionEnvironmental sciencePower stationElectricity generationProcess engineeringSeawaterElectric powerPower (physics)EngineeringSolar energyElectrical engineeringOceanographyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The maximum possible Carnot thermal efficiency of an Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) power system is about 7% as it exploits the water temperature gradient between the surface and the deep ocean, which is only slightly over 20 degree C in tropical waters. The overall efficiency of a multi-megawatt-sized OTEC electrical power plant, all inclusive from seawater to net electric power, is typically around 2%. Only about half of the water temperature gradient can be directly harnessed across the power cycle, as the rest is needed for heat transfer and mass flow to maintain economical heat exchanger and seawater pump sizing. About a third of the gross power generated is consumed pumping seawater, powering auxiliary systems, and in power transmission losses. This paper reviews efficiency as it relates to the OTEC power cycle. OTEC has enormous potential as a source of clean, renewable, and base-load electricity for many nations, territories and states near tropical waters. As OTEC technology matures, large floating OTEC plants are expected to produce energy carriers or synthetic fuels that can be shipped to energy consumers. This paper will provide a current review of the various components used by one OTEC power cycle, their respective efficiencies and their contribution to the overall OTEC power plant economics. A thorough understanding of the efficiency losses, power burden, and potential areas for optimization is critical for OTEC to become an economically viable resource. This paper provides recommendations for the design of the OTEC plant main components and gives guidelines to optimize efficiency such that high quality power can be sold to the utility at competitive rates. Finally, the results of a parametric study of OTEC size in terms of Megawatts produced shows the efficiency gains that can be achieved with large scale OTEC power generation plants. I. Introduction Global energy demand is increasing rapidly. Growing populations and higher standards of living worldwide are pushing the limits of existing energy resources. At the same time hydrocarbon reserves are becoming harder to find. There is growing global concern for energy security and environmental sustainability. Global development and commercialization of renewable technologies is required before existing resources become scarce. For instance: wind energy has been used through the centuries but was surpassed during the Industrial Revolution by coal and oil. However, over the past decade, wind power has seen exponential growth as an energy resource (2009 US DOE). Solar and wind energy have the economic advantage of free " fuel?? but come with the intermittent and variable nature of that " fuel?? source. Ocean thermal energy enjoys the benefit of the large thermal storage of ocean waters and can therefore provide a base-load source of electricity to coastal areas in tropical waters and energy carriers to energy consumers. Figure 1 is a map showing the vast worldwide OTEC resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it