A deep investigation into network performance in virtual machine based cloud environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing research on cloud network (in)stability has primarily focused on communications between Virtual Machines (VMs) inside a cloud, leaving that of VM communications over higher-latency wide-area networks largely unexplored. Through measurement in real-world cloud platforms, we find that there are prevalent and significant degradation and variation for such VM communications with both TCP and UDP traffic, even over lightly utilized networks. Our in-depth measurement and detailed system analysis reveal that the performance variation and degradation are mainly due to the dual-role of the CPU in both computation and network communication in a VM, and they can be dramatically affected by the CPU's scheduling policy. We provide strong evidence that such issues can be addressed in the hypervisor level and present concrete solutions. Such remedies have been implemented and evaluated in our cloud testbed, showing noticeable improvement for long-haul network communications with VMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it