MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cyclosporine excretion into breast milk

2003· article· en· W1982612077 on OpenAlexaff
Myla E. Moretti, Michael Sgro, David W. Johnson, Reg Sauvé, Mary J. Woolgar, Anna Taddio, Zul Verjee, Esther Giesbrecht, Gideon Koren, Shinya Ito

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast milkMedicineBreast feedingAdverse effectExcretionDrugPregnancyPhysiologyObstetricsInternal medicinePediatricsPharmacologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although many female patients of childbearing age who are receiving cyclosporine have successful pregnancies, these women may be advised not to breast-feed. During recent years, cases of uneventful pregnancies and subsequent successful breast-feeding have been reported in the literature. The infant's blood cyclosporine concentration was usually very low. Based on these findings and the lack of detectable adverse effects, some investigators have suggested that women on cyclosporine may breast-feed, challenging the conventional view that cyclosporine is contraindicated during breast-feeding. Here, we report our experience with cyclosporine use during breast-feeding in five mother-infant pairs. We show a wide range of infant exposures to the drug in milk, noting that one of the infants had therapeutic blood concentrations of cyclosporine despite relatively low concentrations of the drug in milk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207