MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982618234 · doi:10.1021/ja0260972

Divergent Pathways of C−H Bond Activation:  Reactions of (<i>t</i>-Bu<sub>3</sub>PN)<sub>2</sub>TiMe<sub>2</sub> with Trimethylaluminum

2002· article· en· W1982618234 on OpenAlexaff
J. Kickham, Frédéric Guérin, Douglas W. Stephan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMetathesisReaction rate constantSalt metathesis reactionLigand (biochemistry)Thermal decompositionStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyDecompositionCrystallographyPolymerizationKineticsOrganic chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of AlMe(3) with (t-Bu(3)PN)(2)TiMe(2) 1 proceeds via competitive reactions of metathesis and C-H activation leading ultimately to two Ti complexes: [(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)Ti(mu-Me)(mu(4)-C)(AlMe(2))(2)](2) 2, [(t-Bu(3)PN)Ti(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)(mu(3)-CH(2))(2)(AlMe(2))(2)(AlMe(3))] 3, and the byproduct (Me(2)Al)(2)(mu-CH(3))(mu-NP(t-Bu(3))) 4. X-ray structural data for 2 and 3 are reported. Compound 3 undergoes thermolysis to generate a new species [Ti(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)(2)(mu(3)-CH(2))(mu(3)-CH)(AlMe(2))(3)] 5. Monitoring of the reaction of 1 with AlMe(3) by (31)P[(1)H] NMR spectroscopy revealed intermediates including (t-Bu(3)PN)TiMe(3) 6. Compound 6 was shown to react with AlMe(3) to give 2 exclusively. Kinetic studies revealed that the sequence of reactions from 6 to 2 involves an initial C-H activation that is a second-order reaction, dependent on the concentration of Ti and Al. The second-order rate constant k(1) was 3.9(5) x 10(-4) M(-1) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 63(2) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#) = -80(6) J/mol x K). The rate constants for the subsequent C-H activations leading to 2 were determined to be k(2) = 1.4(2) x 10(-3) s(-1) and k(3) = 7(1) x 10(-3) s(-1). Returning to the more complex reaction of 1, the rate constant for the ligand metathesis affording 4 and 6 was k(met) = 6.1(5) x 10(-5) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 37(3) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#) = -203(9) J/mol x K). The concurrent reaction of 1 leading to 3 was found to proceed with a rate constant of k(obs) of 6(1) x 10(-5) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 62(5) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#)= -118(17) J/mol x K). Using these kinetic data for these reactions, a stochastic kinetic model was used to compute the concentration profiles of the products and several intermediates with time for reactions using between 10 and 27 equivalents of AlMe(3). These models support the view that equilibrium between 1 x AlMe(3) and 1 x (AlMe(3))(2) accounts for varying product ratios with the concentration of AlMe(3). In a similar vein, similar equilibria account for the transient concentrations of 6 and an intermediate en route to 3. The implications of these reactions and kinetic and thermodynamic data for both C-H bond activation and deactivation pathways for Ti-phosphinimide olefin polymerization catalysts are considered and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207