MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982618234 · doi:10.1021/ja0260972

Divergent Pathways of C−H Bond Activation:  Reactions of (<i>t</i>-Bu<sub>3</sub>PN)<sub>2</sub>TiMe<sub>2</sub> with Trimethylaluminum

2002· article· en· W1982618234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMetathesisReaction rate constantSalt metathesis reactionLigand (biochemistry)Thermal decompositionStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyDecompositionCrystallographyPolymerizationKineticsOrganic chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of AlMe(3) with (t-Bu(3)PN)(2)TiMe(2) 1 proceeds via competitive reactions of metathesis and C-H activation leading ultimately to two Ti complexes: [(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)Ti(mu-Me)(mu(4)-C)(AlMe(2))(2)](2) 2, [(t-Bu(3)PN)Ti(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)(mu(3)-CH(2))(2)(AlMe(2))(2)(AlMe(3))] 3, and the byproduct (Me(2)Al)(2)(mu-CH(3))(mu-NP(t-Bu(3))) 4. X-ray structural data for 2 and 3 are reported. Compound 3 undergoes thermolysis to generate a new species [Ti(mu(2)-t-Bu(3)PN)(2)(mu(3)-CH(2))(mu(3)-CH)(AlMe(2))(3)] 5. Monitoring of the reaction of 1 with AlMe(3) by (31)P[(1)H] NMR spectroscopy revealed intermediates including (t-Bu(3)PN)TiMe(3) 6. Compound 6 was shown to react with AlMe(3) to give 2 exclusively. Kinetic studies revealed that the sequence of reactions from 6 to 2 involves an initial C-H activation that is a second-order reaction, dependent on the concentration of Ti and Al. The second-order rate constant k(1) was 3.9(5) x 10(-4) M(-1) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 63(2) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#) = -80(6) J/mol x K). The rate constants for the subsequent C-H activations leading to 2 were determined to be k(2) = 1.4(2) x 10(-3) s(-1) and k(3) = 7(1) x 10(-3) s(-1). Returning to the more complex reaction of 1, the rate constant for the ligand metathesis affording 4 and 6 was k(met) = 6.1(5) x 10(-5) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 37(3) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#) = -203(9) J/mol x K). The concurrent reaction of 1 leading to 3 was found to proceed with a rate constant of k(obs) of 6(1) x 10(-5) s(-1) (DeltaH(#) = 62(5) kJ/mol, DeltaS(#)= -118(17) J/mol x K). Using these kinetic data for these reactions, a stochastic kinetic model was used to compute the concentration profiles of the products and several intermediates with time for reactions using between 10 and 27 equivalents of AlMe(3). These models support the view that equilibrium between 1 x AlMe(3) and 1 x (AlMe(3))(2) accounts for varying product ratios with the concentration of AlMe(3). In a similar vein, similar equilibria account for the transient concentrations of 6 and an intermediate en route to 3. The implications of these reactions and kinetic and thermodynamic data for both C-H bond activation and deactivation pathways for Ti-phosphinimide olefin polymerization catalysts are considered and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it