MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982863483 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2012.2207910

Mitigation of Bandwidth Limitation in Wireless Doherty Amplifiers With Substantial Bandwidth Enhancement Using Digital Techniques

2012· article· en· W1982863483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)AmplifierWiMAXWidebandDoherty amplifierElectronic engineeringTelecommunications linkCenter frequencyCode division multiple accessElectrical engineeringBandwidth extensionEngineeringOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceWirelessTelecommunicationsDigital signal processingRF power amplifierBand-pass filterChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new method for extending the bandwidth of Doherty power amplifiers (PAs) in the digital domain. The bandwidth enhancement is achieved through a frequency-selective pre-compensation mechanism that is derived to prevent the efficiency degradation that naturally occurs as the frequency of operation deviates from the center frequency. A methodical analysis of the frequency response of the conventional Doherty PA and that of the proposed Doherty PA is carried out to point out the limitations of the former and demonstrate the capability of the latter in recovering the bandwidth. Over the frequency range spanning from 1.96 to 2.46 GHz, the measured drain efficiency at 6-7-dB output power back-off is higher than 40% for the proposed Doherty PA. Such efficiency performance is achievable only from 2.04 to 2.22 GHz using the conventional Doherty PA. Hence, the bandwidth is enhanced from 180 to 500 MHz, which corresponds to an increase by a factor of 2.8 (i.e., almost triple). By applying the proposed methodology, a Doherty PA that is originally designed at the center frequency of 2.14 GHz for downlink wideband code division multiple access became operative at 1.98-GHz uplink wideband code division multiple access (UL-WCDMA), 2.22-GHz long-term evolution (LTE), and 2.34-GHz worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX) bands. The average drain efficiencies for UL-WCDMA, LTE, and WiMAX applications, were 40.1%, 44.2%, and 41.4%, respectively, using the proposed Doherty PA, and 37%, 37.3%, and 35.2%, respectively, using the conventional Doherty PA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it