Transmission-ratio distortion in the Framingham Heart Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmission-ratio distortion (TRD) is a phenomenon in which the segregation of alleles does not obey Mendel's laws. As a simple example, a recessive locus that results in fetal lethality will result in live-born individuals sharing more alleles at this locus than expected under Mendel's laws. This could result in apparent linkage of the phenotype of 'being alive' to such a chromosomal regions. Further, this could result in false-positive linkage when 'affected-only' parametric or non-parametric linkage analysis is performed. Similarly, loci demonstrating TRD may be detectable in family-based association tests as deviant transmission of alleles. Therefore, TRD could result in confounding of family-based association studies of diseases. The Framingham Heart Study data available for Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 is a suitable dataset to determine whether there are loci in the genome that reveal TRD because of the large number of individuals from families, the high-resolution genotyping, and the population-based nature of the study. We have used both genome-wide linkage and family-based association methods to determine whether there are loci that demonstrate TRD in the Framingham Heart Study. Family-based association analysis identified thousands of loci with apparent TRD. However, the vast majority of these are likely the result of genotyping errors with application of strict quality control criteria to the genotype data, and automated inspection of the intensity plots, we identify a small number of loci that may show true TRD, including rs1000548 in intron 6 of S-antigen (arrestin, SAG) on chromosome 2 (p = 7 x 10-10).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".