MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983283724 · doi:10.1002/mren.201100021

Application of Parameter Selection and Estimation Techniques in a Thermal Styrene Polymerization Model

2011· article· en· W1983283724 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyrenePolymerizationChain transferSensitivity (control systems)Ranking (information retrieval)ThermodynamicsMaterials scienceRange (aeronautics)Polymer chemistryBiological systemMathematicsComputer scienceChemistryPolymerRadical polymerizationCopolymerOrganic chemistryPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A model is developed to describe thermally‐initiated polymerization of styrene between 100 and 170 °C. The model accounts for generation and consumption of styrene adduct. Chain transfer to adduct is the only transfer reaction used. Autoacceleration is modeled using the break‐point method of Hui and Hamielec. Using formal ranking and parameter selection techniques that account for parameter sensitivity, correlation and uncertainty, 4 of the 40 model parameters are selected for estimation to improve fit between model predictions and data. After estimation, the model predicts conversion data with a standard error of 5%, and provides excellent fit to a MWD curve obtained at 100 °C. Simulation results confirm that high‐temperature degradation reactions are not important in the temperature range of interest. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it