MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983383585 · doi:10.1002/pen.10120

Three‐dimensional simulation of multi‐material injection molding: Application to gas‐assisted and co‐injection molding

2003· article· en· W1983383585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMolding (decorative)Isothermal processFinite element methodWork (physics)Mechanical engineeringFlow (mathematics)MechanicsTransfer moldingComposite materialNewtonian fluidCore (optical fiber)PolymerThermodynamicsMoldEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents an overview of the results obtained at the Industrial Materials Institute (IMI) on the numerical simulation of the gas‐assisted injection molding and co‐injection molding. For this work, the IMI's three‐dimensional (3D) finite element flow analysis code was used. Non‐Newtonian, non‐isothermal flow solutions are obtained by solving the momentum, mass and energy equations. Two additional transport equations are solved to track polymer/air and skin/core materials interfaces. Solutions are shown for different thin parts and then for thick three‐dimensional geometries. Different operating conditions are considered and the influence of various processing parameters is analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it