MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983405890 · doi:10.1017/s0266466605050292

THREE RANK FORMULAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COVARIANCE MATRICES OF THE BLUE AND THE OLSE IN THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL

2005· article· en· W1983405890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Theory · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRank (graph theory)CovarianceBest linear unbiased predictionEstimatorCombinatoricsOrdinary least squaresApplied mathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the estimation of the expectation vector X β under the general linear model { y , X β,σ 2 V }. We introduce a new handy representation for the rank of the difference of the covariance matrices of the ordinary least squares estimator OLSE( X β) (= Hy , say) and the best linear unbiased estimator BLUE( X β) (= Gy , say). From this formula some well-known conditions for the equality between Hy and Gy follow at once. We recall that the equality between Hy and Gy can be characterized by the rank-subtractivity ordering between the covariance matrices of y and Hy . This rank characterization suggests a particular presentation for the rank of the difference of the covariance matrices of Hy and Gy . We show, however, that this presentation is valid if and only if the model is connected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it