MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983405890 · doi:10.1017/s0266466605050292

THREE RANK FORMULAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COVARIANCE MATRICES OF THE BLUE AND THE OLSE IN THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL

2005· article· en· W1983405890 on OpenAlexaff
Simo Puntanen, George P. H. Styan, Yongge Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Theory · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRank (graph theory)CovarianceBest linear unbiased predictionEstimatorCombinatoricsOrdinary least squaresApplied mathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the estimation of the expectation vector X β under the general linear model { y , X β,σ 2 V }. We introduce a new handy representation for the rank of the difference of the covariance matrices of the ordinary least squares estimator OLSE( X β) (= Hy , say) and the best linear unbiased estimator BLUE( X β) (= Gy , say). From this formula some well-known conditions for the equality between Hy and Gy follow at once. We recall that the equality between Hy and Gy can be characterized by the rank-subtractivity ordering between the covariance matrices of y and Hy . This rank characterization suggests a particular presentation for the rank of the difference of the covariance matrices of Hy and Gy . We show, however, that this presentation is valid if and only if the model is connected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconometric TheorySame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207