MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983637205 · doi:10.1145/1968502.1968511

FPGA Acceleration of MultiFactor CDO Pricing

2011· article· en· W1983637205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceXeonCollateralized debt obligationField-programmable gate arrayPortfolioExploitParallel computingEmbedded systemFinanceCollateralBusinessComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last decade has seen a significant growth in the financial industry. The recent widespread use of Internet technology has increased the accessibility of the general population to financial data, thereby increasing the average portfolio size. This increase, compounded by the need for accurate real-time results, has led to a rising demand for faster risk simulations. Often, accurately pricing widespread instruments, such as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), can take excessively long due to their multifactor assets dependency. We present a hardware implementation for a MultiFactor Gaussian Copula (MFGC) CDO pricing algorithm. Through a detailed benchmark exploration we demonstrate how reconfigurable hardware could be used to exploit fine-grain parallelism. Our results show that our implementation mapped onto a Xilinx Virtex 5 (XC5VSX50T) FPGA is over 71 times faster than corresponding software running on a single core 3.4 GHz Intel Xeon processor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it