MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Loss of Fish Habitat as a Consequence of Inappropriately Constructed Stream Crossings

2005· article· en· W1983662331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersVlaamse regering
KeywordsCulvertHabitatFish <Actinopterygii>SalmoFisherySTREAMSIndigenousDiversity of fishTruckGeographyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental protectionEcologyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the light of declines in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) stocks, we sought to determine the extent to which stream crossings along a newly constructed section of the Trans Labrador Highway (TLH Phase II) in southern Labrador accorded with government regulations for fish habitat protection. We surveyed crossings of permanent streams over a 210 km road segment, containing 4 bridges and 47 culverts. Fifty-three percent of culverts posed problems to fish passage, due to poor design or poor installation. We conjecture that cost and inadequate environmental oversight in the field explain the weak compliance with the relevant fisheries guidelines. Our research has prompted the federal regulator to instigate remediation of problems with the Phase II part of the highway. In addition many of the planned stream crossings for Phase III of the TLH were re-designed, and a commitment to careful monitoring of the installations has been made by the federal regulator in cooperation with the indigenous inhabitants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it