MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983709591 · doi:10.1021/cm010281p

Effect of Substitution on the Electrochemical and Xerographic Properties of Triarylamines:  Correlation to the Hammett Parameter of the Substituent and Calculated HOMO Energy Level

2001· article· en· W1983709591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsXerox (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstituentAnilineElectrochemistryChemistryCondensationPhotochemistryMaterials scienceComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsElectrodePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been found that both the electrochemical and xerographic properties of a series of triarylamines vary with the nature (quantified by its Hammett parameter, σ) and the frequency of substituents that make up a triarylamine. Three series of triarylamines, encompassing a total of 35 compounds, have been synthesized by Ullman condensation of an appropriately substituted aniline with an excess of an appropriately substituted iodophenylene by a published procedure [Goodbrand, H. B.; Hu, N. X. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64 (2), 670−674]. The xerographic properties, including transport properties, of a select number of compounds have been measured as solid-state solutions in polycarbonate-Z. The recorded xerographic properties varied with the measured oxidation potential ( E 1/2 ) of the molecule, which in turn correlates to both the Hammett parameter of the substituent and the calculated HOMO energy level of the triarylamine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it